Man, I hate personality profiles

Including the Myers-Briggs. I meant, especially the Myers-Briggs. I have been known to walk out of conference sessions when the profiles are passed out. As the author notes--it is like astrology.  From Wired.

The Myers-Briggs Personality Test Is Bunk But I Don’t Care
The obvious criticism of this test is that it’s based on dichotomies. Are you perceiving or judging? Introverted or extroverted? You must choose. This reeks of pseudo-science. Of course, most of us don’t fall clearly on one side or the other. When the specific introvert vs. extrovert duality was a hot topic a few years ago, many writers persuasively argued against reducing socialization patterns to a simplistic either/or. Indeed, reams of psychological literature debunks MBTI as wildly inconsistent—many people will test differently within weeks—and over reliant on polarities. For instance, someone can certainly be both deeply thinking and feeling, and we all know folks who appear to be neither. “In social science, we use four standards: are the categories reliable, valid, independent, and comprehensive? For the MBTI, the evidence says not very, no, no, and not really,” organizational psychologist Adam Grant wrote in Psychology Today after reviewing all the science on MBTI. It’s pretty damning.


Popular posts from this blog

Helicoptor parenting

Cheap eats?

Win early